When a comment almost exactly matches the range of an
accidental complex transclusion consisting only of
pages from the 'Template' namespace and wikitext fragments,
I think we can safely allow replying to the comment.
Even if this turns out to be incorrect in some cases,
the failure will be more graceful after the changes in T313100:
instead of potentially duplicating contents from a template,
the worst case now is that the reply will appear in the wrong
place (at the end of the transclusion).
Bug: T313093
Change-Id: Ie8da09d74a652d893fd8c3e2435ef6cb70fad64a
We can't use these is class method function signatures, but we
can use within the functions themselves.
Change-Id: Ic24e47d6647226172a3bfacd81398d26143d98e4
The implementation in Parser doesn't descend into sub-thread.
Re-use the getThreadSummary method in ThreadItem and traverse
the thread properly.
Bug: T298617
Change-Id: I318d9012eb83f37ccbe463923524ef2e9f995ced
We can no longer change IDs so easily, because they're stored in the
permalink database, so remove this mechanism to make sure it's not
accidentally used in the future.
Change-Id: I392ee1f49c48fc2f23d05e9a37c643438b4f2b9a
Rename ThreadItem to ContentThreadItem, then create a new ThreadItem
interface containing only the methods that we'll be able to implement
using only the persistently stored data (no parsing), then create a
DatabaseThreadItem. Do the same for CommentItem and HeadingItem.
ThreadItemSet gets a similar treatment, but it's basically only for
Phan's type checking. (This is sad.)
Change-Id: I1633049befe8ec169753b82eb876459af1f63fe8
