Using `updateCacheExpiry()` in this way appears to be established
with examples of other use in WMF production such as:
- CategortyTree extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<categorytree>`.
- RSS extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<rss>`.
- intersection extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<DynamicPageList>`.
- Math extension:
custom cache expiry if `<math>` failed.
- Wikibase extension, Flow extension:
no caching for certain namespaces or content types.
- Graph extension, Kartographer extension:
via onParserAfterParse hook, no caching if on preview.
Bug: T280605
Change-Id: Iea41ab8599ffae4622c97d682258b1b64eaf9ba2
Previously we relied on the NamespaceInfo check below to reject
special pages, but after commit 07d885248bc54bdc0f12d9745916c794d45ec81c
in MediaWiki core, PageProps throws an exception when called with a
special page.
Bug: T281180
Depends-On: I32c94107fde96b9d6344c77b621be9b3b9b7faaf
Change-Id: I0fd893c63a6e92f6c84e7aa92270852e1137fcad
The issue occurred when replying to a comment consisting of multiple
list items, starting with a <dt> (instead of the expected <dd>), so
that the comment is considered to be unindented.
Modifier tried to add the reply directly inside the list (<dl>) rather
than inside the last list item (<dt>), which caused it to be confused
about indentation levels and try to un-indent more times than there
were indentations.
The simplest solution, given the existing code, is to add the reply
outside the list instead, in a new list. This results in a "list gap"
(<dl><dt>...</dt><dd>...</dd></dl><dl><dd>...</dd></dl>), but I think
it's acceptable for this rare case.
There are separate tests cases for old Parser and for Parsoid HTML,
because they parse the original wikitext differently (with the old
Parser producing HTML with a list gap too).
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: Ie0ee960e7090cf051ee547b480c980e9530eda51
The regexps needs to be non-greedy, otherwise it could swallow up a
large chunk of the page (up to the next comment).
I noticed this when adding tests for this code, in the 'unclosed-font'
test case (Ief9648b8805fadcc170c54b627eb669cc8b907b6).
Change-Id: I5f67a9599b0cb07bdd53abeebac9ada221181b66
If curLevel or desiredLevel are calculated incorrectly, this loop
could never end.
In JS, something would throw an exception before going infinite, but
PHP is happy to trot along despite accessing properties of null and
attaching multiple children to a document node.
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: I1784f550ec3a23dcded4f2b1def97e51cb414b7b
We added it because the initial designs for the subscribe action were
much easier to implement like this, and topic "containers" (T269950)
would have required it.
However, the latest design of the subscribe action will not need it
(T279149), and topic containers are still very far away, so let's
remove it for now.
Bug: T280433
Change-Id: I21a23e9bea43f24d265750926fbd62b99038d3f1
The 'dtenable' does not appear to take user-provided content that
requires language normalization. In general getRawVal should be used,
or if it's user input that needs normalization, use getText(). Perhaps
one day we'll alias or deprecate getVal (which is currently an odd
mid-way hybrid, most closely to getText; originally created for
EditPage.php textareas).
Change-Id: I8364c84f8c4f700da6e208df2e87c29bf254d685
We can't allow it, because the required database tables may not exist
yet (T280082).
This is meant to be temporary until we complete DBA review and the
tables are created.
Bug: T280082
Change-Id: I8f947b779c6829763d3413931c6d354e6f7aee4d
As of 7ad6328223, we also use this data
to check whether comments exist on the page, not only whether they're
transcluded.
Follow-up to 42ce942c86.
Bug: T275821
Bug: T273413
Change-Id: I95eb85354e7b84cc10ab703d28315d0667696f4c
The existing comment IDs can't be used to find the same comment on
a different revision or page (when it's transcluded), because they
depend on the comment's parent and its position on the page.
Comment names depend only on the author and timestamp. The trade-off
is that they can't distinguish comments posted within the same minute,
or in the same edit, so we will still need the IDs sometimes.
Prefer using comment names when replying, if they're not ambiguous.
This fixes T273413 and T275821.
Heading names depend on the author and timestamp of the oldest comment.
This way we don't have to detect changes to the heading text, but we
can't distinguish headings without any comments.
Bug: T274685
Bug: T273413
Bug: T275821
Change-Id: Id85c50ba38d1e532cec106708c077b908a3fcd49
