We switched to our memory-wrapped store everywhere outside the
VE surface, but not in the VE surface itself.
Change the way we construct MemoryStorage objects so that they can
be constructed from a specific mw.SafeStorage instance.
Ensure MemoryStorage's cache is populated with initial storage object
data, and that the cache is copied over when we create derivative
objectes.
Bug: T310438
Change-Id: I652428f114dc5169195887cb8ca719ae196bb76f
Since change I29f6af4cc7c71a63a6d1bafc53d16b9abd1b60ec, VisualEditor
handles the Escape key to emit a 'cancel' event. We need to listen to
this event to allow Escape to close our editor when the surface is
focussed, in addition to the existing handling for the Escape key.
Change-Id: I8c0f2678d104a76d6a223aca9b57123b9f587ac7
Clearing the widget removes all the surfaces, meaning there are
no doc-state variables to cleanup. Switch the order of these
two calls.
Change-Id: I6c095a171096cd700ce4cd31b08fa3b982ab2401
* Document all methods
* Rename comment to threadItem
* Use this.threadItem instead of passing in identical
threadItem in various methods.
* Don't pass threadItem to ReplyWidget as we already
pass the whole CommentController.
Change-Id: If9aad0bcf9f0e4ebf3342b75631ddac8b57f7d87
These types can be passed a parameters to any file without
creating a dependency, so it makes more sense to allow
the globally.
Change-Id: I5504465fd997b46547642e7046993b370b85586e
Currently the message appears too often when the user is not really
intending to interact with the widget.
Bug: T287901
Bug: T288316
Change-Id: I38b4c0b8817b9a9238fb6adc91ab2d1231650eff
Longer, but follows the style guide and less likely to conflict.
We need to account for init classes in the cache being around for
a while.
Change-Id: I738bc93393850db320fdbda2b003ca8ac40556da
The same ReplyWidget instance can be re-used when the user cancels
replying and then starts replying again to the same comment.
Previously, the initial values passed to the constructor (when switching
modes) would still persist in this case, even if they were incorrect.
Bug: T263061
Change-Id: I3dff007456bfd4f3149c718ae72fbf373a2e2913
Now consistently uses setReadOnly instead of setDisabled.
Slight styling regression was fixed in I01e11c2ed.
Change-Id: Ice7ce00929ff9a53d0fb533f1094e7324749f3a4
Causes page corruption, in a new way we haven't seen before.
* Revert "Move page updating logic to controller.js"
This reverts commit 54fdc6de06.
* Revert "ReplyWidget: Move clear methods from #teardown to #clear"
This reverts commit 9b811a94e0.
* Revert "ApiDiscussionToolsEdit: Do not pass 'basetimestamp'"
This reverts commit 7de5938a6f.
* Revert "Use DOMCompat::getOuterHTML instead of doc->saveHTML()"
This reverts commit 7b2448d2f0.
* Revert "CommentController: Remove remains of client-side edit conflict handling"
This reverts commit 2d038af705.
* Revert "Restore error message for when comment is deleted while replying"
This reverts commit 655c0526d6.
* Revert "Use transcluded from API to avoid ever fetching Parsoid DOM in client"
This reverts commit 9d0fc184fe.
* Revert "Create a 'transcludedfrom' API endpoint"
This reverts commit 5d8f3b9051.
* Revert "Edit API for replies"
This reverts commit 8829a1a412.
Bug: T259855
Change-Id: I6419408c6194ec0afa6b8ee604b12c1a24c6ac7b
This reverts commit 96953647c3.
* Re-apply "Edit API for replies"
This applies commit 8829a1a412.
* Re-apply "Create a 'transcludedfrom' API endpoint"
This applies commit 5d8f3b9051.
* Re-apply "Use transcluded from API to avoid ever fetching Parsoid DOM in client"
This applies commit 9d0fc184fe.
* Re-apply "Restore error message for when comment is deleted while replying"
This applies commit 655c0526d6.
Change-Id: Id20d21899f87464636022aa0683f8c03e0060117
Causes page corruption.
* Revert "Restore error message for when comment is deleted while replying"
This reverts commit 655c0526d6.
* Revert "Use transcluded from API to avoid ever fetching Parsoid DOM in client"
This reverts commit 9d0fc184fe.
* Revert "Create a 'transcludedfrom' API endpoint"
This reverts commit 5d8f3b9051.
* Revert "Edit API for replies"
This reverts commit 8829a1a412.
Bug: T259855
Change-Id: I98036f14dd900b51f20e98696e31b9b618eceee1
Load 'ext.visualEditor.mwsignature' (which implements VE's existing
handling for signatures), then subclass and override a bunch of things
in order to:
* Replace the context menu with a note that you don't need to type the
signature when commenting using the reply widget
* Override the sequence/command to insert signature so that it selects
it afterwards and thus displays the context menu
* Treat signatures as signature nodes when switching from wikitext,
instead of the normal pre-save transform turning them into regular
links and text
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: Icb542451c2307ab51e56bd627804096c7b5552c8
* Track editor mode switching between visual and source (plain)
* Track interactions with checkboxes
* Fix the tracking of firstChange when switching with content
Bug: T254291
Change-Id: I0e243e393b02952684f34dbbe1697633c0b2561a
This means we have an instance for each comment, which makes keeping
track of local variables much simpler, and will make switching out
the widgets easier.
Change-Id: I7584870225b1a14146852987d6a40ad05957387c
I don't like that I had to special-case `<p>` tags (top-level
comments) in this code. I feel like it should be possible to handle
top-level comments and replies in a generic way, but I couldn't find
a way to do it that actually worked.
Notes about changes to the behavior, based on the test cases:
* Given a top-level comment A, if there was a "list gap" in the
replies to it: previously new replies would be incorrectly added at
the location of the gap; now they are added after the last reply.
(T242822)
Example: "pl", comment at "08:23, 29 wrz 2018 (CEST)"
* Given a top-level comment A and a reply to it B that skips an
indentation level: previously new replies to A would be added with
the same indentation level as B; now they are added with the
indentation level of A plus one. (The old behavior wasn't a bug, and
this is an accidental effect of other changes, but it seems okay.)
Example: "pl", comment at "03:22, 30 wrz 2018 (CEST)"
and reply at "09:43, 30 wrz 2018 (CEST)"
* Given a top-level comment A, a reply to it B, and a following
top-level comment C that starts at the same indentation level as B:
previously new replies to A would be incorrectly added in the middle
of the comment C, due to the DOM list structure; now they are added
before C. (T241391)
(It seems that comment C was supposed to be a multi-line reply that
was wrongly indented. Unfortunately we have no way to distinguish
this case from a top-level multi-line comment that just happens to
start with a bullet list.)
Example: "pl", comments at "03:36, 24 paź 2018 (CEST)",
"08:35, 24 paź 2018 (CEST)", "17:14, 24 paź 2018 (CEST)"
* In the "en" example, there are some other changes where funnily
nested tags result in slightly different results with the new code.
They don't look important.
* In rare cases, we must split an existing list to add a reply in the
right place. (Basically add `</ul>` before the reply and `<ul>`
after, but it's a bit awkward in DOM terms.)
Example: split-list.html, comment "aaa"; also split-list2.html
(which is the result of saving the previous reply), comment "aaa"
* The modifier can no longer generate DOM that is invalid HTML, fixing
a FIXME in modifier.test.js (or at least, it doesn't happen in these
test cases any more).
Bug: T241391
Bug: T242822
Change-Id: I2a70db01e9a8916c5636bc59ea8490166966d5ec
