This is a direct follow up for I6f05842 where we already started
supporting dashes, but converted them to underscores. The only change
in this patch is that the CSS class will use the message key as it
is, without the dashes being converted to underscores. I added a test
case specifically for this.
Bug: T352676
Change-Id: Ic22e897c27b8371e3b1ed63932b619e7af71bd5c
In some tests we want to see the message parameters. But not here.
Simply echoing the message key (thats parameter number one) is
enough.
Change-Id: Id9824cbbe944c84c9fd1932b0863ac1b3f232b75
I think this was just a mistake in I5457304 when this test was
written. There was never an ->exists() call in the code, as far as
I can see.
This is motivated by our ongoing, probably year-long efforts to
clean this codebase up, see T335129.
Change-Id: I72d89213c5cff06d78ac119b3c79827afbd0b4f5
I could not find any connect() was applied from this codebase to
the SurfaceModel. Looking back it seems that the code that connects
the event was removed in Icba13d84e10cf18a6c68e26448b2efe93b8c42b8
and the disconnect was never touched.
Bug: T369005
Change-Id: Ieab623751dd946ba43c42a1be144e6b3725abce3
There's no need to populate and use the form fields when we're
reusing a reference. The group and content are already stored
in the model and we can insert more directly.
I found that it's also not needed to update the internal item
because we're not changing the content or group. The same is done
in Citoid when reusing a reference.
Bug: T369003
Change-Id: I57315aafb73b0cd68a0d397d2f79833ac54a7c7f
Singleton always steps up to the original document from fragments, to
give absolute numbering.
Bug: T370874
Change-Id: I0353649289f6c8fe26fa6bdff5d2367b7b575bac
Mainly leaving out the event handling for the change detection to
still keep it simple.
Also the data flow back for editing the content is still somewhat
opaque because the relevant data is passed by reference. I might
change that in follow up patches so it's more clear.
Bug: T369005
Change-Id: I93b62791ef10bf318697905af8a0c5b5d438fdb5
This patch gives us the same number as will appear in the document,
even when subrefs are present.
Tests could be improved using sinon to check some call assertions
but should be fine for now.
Removed the test for placeholders, because these should be filtered
in MWDocumentReferences.getGroupRefsByParents()
Bug: T370874
Change-Id: I7543a6593308c529bcfbeb0835a7c0882cbf8621
Minor tweak to render the parent as HTML, without fixing anything
else about the layout.
Bug: T370873
Change-Id: I507acf7b86a20d1965bbb32fdc0132b41c929d0c
Some wikis such as eswiki and frwiki prefer to hide the square
brackets by default. Adding a selector-friendly DOM element around
the brackets supports this customization.
This makes it possible to hide the brackets with CSS:
.cite-bracket {
display: none;
}
And it also becomes possible to hide the brackets but make them
appear in copy-pasted article content:
.cite-bracket {
font-size: 0;
}
Bug: T370512
Depends-On: I56b52c399d2c76689fdcb0bc7fd50a8c0ced28fd
Change-Id: Id8684ccee2e6725af2c861da20fc31af1067e614
Now the brackets can be hidden with `display: none;` or made
invisible but appear in copy-pasted content with `font-size: 0;`.
Bug: T370512
Change-Id: I21accb6bf9cdd7f96144cc9a762ff889e48efca4
Some wikis prefer to use Western Arabic numerals rather than the
digit transformation table associated with the content language
script. For these, we should respect the existing
$wgTranslateNumerals configuration settings.
Bug: T370585
Change-Id: I663ae28c5b5d4fdd66b8590eb0b453ec25c2db84
This should cause no user-facing changes.
Now the per-language overrides are expressed as pure data and styling
happens in a single file. We can clearly see the types of
customization that have been made so far.
The CSS styling has also been enhanced, it can now be customized by
setting the CSS variables alone.
Bug: T370027
Change-Id: I2a1bf0365ac0c40991a4fe3f9a2c05dba8b7510c
This is really just a bug. The reuse tab in the reference dialog
always supported keyboard actions (cursor up and down). It was just
impossible to see it because the OOUI base widget we use here doesn't
come with a default styling for this. I suspect this got lost with
some OOUI update years ago. Let's just fix it.
The colors are what OOUI dictates for this situation.
Bug: T360034
Change-Id: I6cfd423830bc0cc86b1aff5dc08a53c49b6e2d9f
Note this actually changes the "subtle" color to be darker. As far
as I understand this is an intentional decision. The old color token
from OOUI is deprecated and intentionally made darker in Codex.
See Ie667c35 and most notably T313502.
Change-Id: I37ad25aa6821d61fe3321e1390d1ccf987075250
