With this patch, we show reflists in a hierarchical view with subrefs
listed under their parent.
TODO in follow-up patch: numbering of subrefs is still incorrect.
Change-Id: Ia82658af72caebd29241b9bd329d236ddc3f1e6d
Pure refactor which shouldn't change output in production. Switches
to interfacing with MWDocumentReferences to get refs in index order.
Temporarily suppresses any subrefs, we only show top-level refs.
Bug: T247921
Change-Id: I9c8347b064173027f436722c87e15e0381c958bd
I could just remove the getElementById replacement that was
failing the tests. In the Popups extension there really is a
renderer test that mocks this function call but that test is not
part of this file.
Also it seems that tracking is never triggered here. I think that
the beacon overwrite was only added to avoid tracking.
See I2638611ba67b785338f7e98a1c4b08a5e829812d
Change-Id: Ic3540f6f73783e79c81e2b693d2bf96cfc7fc66b
Identify both parent and child reference (reference and extended
reference) and display them in the reference preview popup.
This is a very simple basic implementation so at least avoid that
the sub referenc content is shown without context.
Bug: T239228
Change-Id: I857e1be32db9fd72073015cbba1b1bd37e32085f
The Citoid dialog won't be available when the .json configuration
is missing. That's why test always failed here when triggered
from the Citoid CI.
Bug: T366383
Change-Id: I88ad478250328896c504ccbc95a973d4a0100dd7
In some cases the click on the save button did not trigger the
save dialog. After playing around with this, it seems that the
only thing helping here is a little pause.
Even if we wait for the button to change the state to `enabled`
the click sometimes does not trigger the dialog.
Bug: T366383
Change-Id: I2754fd5a0e9b439e9e0378f3597f67e743a6d0c1
I could identify and fix the issue in
I3224c6131a6e959821bc36e4525889e5088777a2
stress test run fine see
I8e38e8cc533065998f91794a9e490d38d77ad21a
Bug: T368267
Change-Id: Ib7db6c39988ef45404817b8c7a68132572f16e36
This was never working it seems. The result of the check needs to
be wrapped in an expect() call.
Bug: T368267
Change-Id: I3224c6131a6e959821bc36e4525889e5088777a2
C&P mistake in the original implementation. Otherwise we end up
with an undefined in the name.
Bug: T362347
Change-Id: I5c6957ca9fc81e6a5211aab050025eea5d0addbe
The idea is to make the code less ambiguous and easier to predict.
We passed the same information around two times in a few places.
Change-Id: I39c7a2962bb70bbe40074986e63b1051d0766ea2
Same as in I7e82e03. The extra "shield" element was added in
2013 (!), see Ib244ff6. Back then we couldn't use the CSS property.
But nowadays we can.
Bug: T360034
Bug: T367030
Change-Id: Ib41e062491e65eabc8a52facefe283ba04ce16ff
To make sure also the parent gets a name even if it is not re-used
we need to iterate the list of reference to see if there's at least
one child that matches the parent.
The rest will be taken care of by getUniqueListKey that makes sure
that the matching temporary names will result in matching literal
names.
TODO:
- Write a ve.dm.Convertor test which shows the auto-name being
added.
Bug: T367031
Change-Id: I6ef42c8ffc8a4ff9224bfb2a910682d2c44f0dd2
I believe this was a mistake in the previous patch Idd57997. Using
only the .text() of the parent reference is not sufficient. Think of
a reference that contains a <math> formula or – even worse – is
nothing but a <math> formula. The preview will be empty in this case.
Click handlers in the preview need to be disabled. It's only a
preview.
Bug: T367030
Change-Id: I7e82e03ecfeb4e9cf132985684cff5e191506307
This makes it much easier to deal with the internal auto names
used on new elements created during one edit session.
We're ignoring the correct generation of the auto name literals
for now.
Bug: T367031
Bug: T367030
Change-Id: Idd579970cb64500dac27053213e9b116f23b6d76
Also removing the weird hook code that was only there to make sure
JS finished loading afaik and then was copied over to other parts
of the codebase.
Change-Id: I90185b14de69bf3f4b6230b9a87c7eff261e72b4
With this change the <ol> is added after the inner list of <li> was
parsed as wikitext. In other words, the outer <ol> is now raw HTML
and not sanitized any more. This is fine because it's generated via
code. It doesn't contain any user input.
You might ask how it is possible to parse "invalid" HTML that
contains a sequence of <li> without the outer <ol>. This is fine
because the wikitext parser doesn't care about the nesting structure
of HTML elements. This is done later by Remex (Tidy). But Remex is
never called here. What we care about here is that the wikitext
parser sanitizes the individual HTML elements and their attributes.
The <ol> doesn't need sanitization.
This will make it possible to use reserved data attributes for
T196828. A bazillion unit and parser tests prove that this change
doesn't have any unwanted side-effects.
Bug: T196828
Bug: T239572
Change-Id: I0a9d419f48cad5ddb7251c8fdd2cf9506649436b
