Each of these TODOs is something that needs to be fixed or implemented,
so it's helpful to map them to tasks.
Change-Id: I807208392d8a609d7f3b371dc3560a48f3578092
* Always have an empty line between @param and @return to improve
readability as well as consistency within this codebase (before, both
styles have been used).
* Flip parameter order in validateRefInReferences() for consistency with
the rest of the code.
* In Cite::guardedRef() the Parser was now the 1st parameter. I changed
all related functions the same way to make the code less surprising.
* Same in CiteUnitTest. This is really just the @dataProvider. But I feel
it's still helpful to have the arguments in the same order everywhere, if
possible.
* Add a few strict type hints.
* It seems the preferred style for PHP7 return types is `… ) : string {`
with a space before the `:`. There is currently no PHPCS sniff for this.
However, I think this codebase should be consistent, one way or the other.
Change-Id: I91d232be727afd26ff20526ab4ef63aa5ba6bacf
There is currently no strict CodeSniffer rule for this. I think we
need to have one sooner or later. Anyway, what I find important is to
have a consistent code style in one codebase.
I refused to do this change previously because I don't like to mess
with Git blame if it's not really necessary. However, at this point all
code was moved around anyway.
I ended removing a comment that appears misplaced now, and doesn't help
maiing the code more readable. I like not having a dot at the end if
it's not really a sentence.
Change-Id: Id1d4f43277c69080c512c1a5ceff4c948bfa05be
In the end I don't care much if we agree on having this newline, or
not. What I care about more is that this codebase is consistent.
Personally I prefer having the newline. It creates a visible separation
between what "goes in" and what "goes out" (@throws and @return).
Change-Id: Ibc60af621132e415a5579397c01688fa21eb0be5
The rollback feature was not able to properly restore a __placeholder__.
That's why a specific use case was behaving different. This already
worked just fine:
<ref extends="a">…</ref>
<references>
<ref name="a">…</ref>
</references>
But this didn't, even if it is the exact same from the users
perspective:
<ref extends="a">…</ref>
{{#tag:references|
<ref name="a">…</ref>
}}
Bug: T239810
Change-Id: I163a1bffb9450a9e7f776e32e66fb08d0452cdb9
Note this leaves *another* bug behind. When a <ref> is properly reused
by name="…", and the content is fine (either missing or identical),
possibly conflicting extends="…" attributes are currently entirely
ignored. However, this is already much better than what happened before.
Bug: T242110
Change-Id: Id808ce31c8036cc290f68bb3e8c5a7b12f4f44cf
This should now roughly resemble 2nd level indentation for nested
list elements. CSS Janus should take care of RTL compatibily.
Bug: T239329
Change-Id: I2eb5b63033f558555b1d79faba82b5a774ddd934
This is an extremely relevant use case, but we never had a test for
this:
Some text.<ref extends="book">Page 2</ref>
<references>
<ref name="book">Title of the book</ref>
</references>
What this means: There is no reference in the text that points to the
book as a whole, only references that point to individual pages. The
base <ref> is not used in the text.
This is already properly rendered. There is no "jump back to the text"
link. However, this fails when <references> is wrapped in {{#tag:…}}.
Bug: T239810
Change-Id: Id22db0238266a4fd6131d1a10eb6bf6227552c19
The rollbackRefs function no longer needs to "know" details about
how to turn a refCallStack item into a redo item. This is better a
responsibility of the subroutine, where the items are unpacked.
Change-Id: I1e2ff77cb5e66d70e451ee09e641ff752c770ab4
As a result, the references are now treated like any other
template-generated reference, e.g. they can't be edited.
Previously they could be edited as if they weren't template-generated,
causing trouble. Editing them had no effect (changes would not be
saved), and copy-pasting them into another page resulted in
"substituted" content (template metadata was lost).
Bug: T209493
Change-Id: I4e75ccd57cd752a726653c725d8c29a09306e83b
I tried to run these tests with a very old version of this code base
(from 2018) to confirm this is the correct behavior.
Bug: T241303
Change-Id: Id97d016b199458aa178ca732282e9c0e91e291a4
The logic was changed in 51ff3cc819.
Only `responsive="0"` is supposed to disable responsive references,
any other value should enable it.
Bug: T241303
Change-Id: I8c99bf93c739d6dba348785b1b6452cfce2c57c9
One of the most significant changes is when I noticed that the $group
can never be null. We set it to DEFAULT_GROUP before. That's an empty
string.
I'm not very happy with the two @phan-suppress-next-line. Is there a
better way to fix these lines?
Change-Id: I33c1681e2f3857cb6701da71f4ed8893caff4d1e
I hope this is more readable. This patch does two things: It uses
array keys to name all elements in the data provider. (Note these
array keys don't actually do anything, PHPUnit ignores them.) And this
patch merges two parameters into a single $expectedResult.
Change-Id: Ib7adc32bf8bfd523735591d35d0bcabd3b853cfc
Since I3db5175 the ParserCloned hook handler does not rely on cloning
the Cite object any more. There is no cloning any more. This is dead
code and we could remove it. Just to be sure I propose to keep the
method, but let it throw an exception.
Bug: T240248
Change-Id: I2057ea652ca25f4c7031c28a6e713671738f5e22
These should be impossible conditions, we don't want to continue with
processing.
I hate this patch, it's a temporary workaround until someone rewrites
or replaces the rollback logic, for example with a two-pass parse.
Change-Id: I6a1327e397d4272fa412c3f290c2107d867d2854
In historical versions of the Cite extension, unclosed <ref> tags were
sometimes caught and rendered as another, unrelated validation error.
This is no longer the case thanks to a more accurate check for
unclosed <ref> tags.
Remove user-facing text explaining the edge condition.
Change-Id: Ic27e120213e39e3774ad7c8ee76eabd2faa74234
We print error messages in red, bold, large text so that they stand
out from content. "<code>" spans, which are prevalent in our messages,
were styled with black text by accident, this patch turns them red.
This should cause less annoyance on readers.
Change-Id: Ic911552909ecc5ace4be927cad5b835e1006355e
