CI already ensures that VisualEditor is loaded alongside Cite, so
the defensive check in the code isn't needed; ext.cite.visualEditor is
defined statically, it's just injected into the page dynamically in the
VisualEditor code handling VisualEditorPluginModules.
Bug: T232875
Change-Id: Ie5e096feca92f9c3ef13c732f3f1ae491e2b7d03
This change does have two effects:
1. Instead of prepending a newline individually in every possible
code path, we do it one time at the end. But only if there is
something in the output. This does not change anything, as proven by
the unchanged parser tests.
2. I removed the newline between the <h2> and the generated
<references> element. Note that both these elements are created in
the same method, next to each other. So there is no way this can
influence other wikitext. Unfortunately this code path is executed
only when using the *preview* function, and impossible to be covered
by parser tests because of this. However, it's covered by unit tests.
This refactoring is motivated by, but not required for T148701.
Bug: T148701
Change-Id: I6691c70f8e3fa3f21e2d11035bed9cdc2dc87093
Previously the reflist was added at the end of the last line of text,
which messes up paragraph wrapping (as seen in many test cases), and
generated invalid HTML when the last line was a list item (T148701).
(second try, previously reverted in 8c933d03c5)
Note this affects only pages where the <references /> tag is missing,
and the references section is auto-generated at the very end of the page.
Bug: T148701
Change-Id: Ib2101346434a4e317b5fc7379215b60c7020cb2b
The most common cleanup required by switching to tidy output was adding
missing <p>-wrappers to the last item before <references/>.
Bug: T246285
Change-Id: I7c8a08c4e6eff7caf4539a26fae475a4133f9a0c
While working on the patch I4303642 I was worried about the line
array_pop( $this->refCallStack )
in the rollback code. Since the patch changed the position of follow
elements in the stack, an array_pop() would pop different elements.
It turns out this is impossible. Rollbacks are only done for <ref>
elements inside a <references> tag, immediatelly after reaching the
closing </references>. It's impossible to use follow="…" inside
<references>. It will not be added to the stack, and therefore not
rolled back.
Even if the edge case would be possible, the *old* code that placed
follow elements on the *other* side of the stack would have been
wrong then.
The test cases in this patch try to hit this edge case, and are
expected to not be able to do so.
Change-Id: I4380bf443db17c6214dbfa2cbda62b46db04258a
Previously the reflist was added at the end of the last line of text,
which messes up paragraph wrapping (as seen in many test cases), and
generated invalid HTML when the last line was a list item (T148701).
Bug: T148701
Change-Id: Ifc873fc913e717026d80d54b570c594d1073fb42
This removes a few tiny pieces of code, and a large chunk related to
incomplete follow="…" attributes (see T240858). It turns out we don't
need to insert elements at the top of the ReferenceStack::$refs
array, because this array is reordered anyway in
ReferencesFormatter::formatRefsList()!
Incomplete follow refs don't have a number, and are ordered to the top
because of this, as before. This doesn't change with this patch.
Change-Id: I43036420be22feb8f0f287d9ccee2afd317df2a9
