… as well as "cite_warning". Both are extremely trivial and don't
really do anything by default. All they do is to add the prefix
"Cite error:" or "Cite warning:" to all error messages.
This patch will make it possible to disable both messages by
default, i.e. replace their default in en.json with "-" without
breaking anything. That's part of the plan outlined in T353695.
Local on-wiki overrides will continue to work.
Bug: T353695
Change-Id: I374800d0d0b837cd17ed3a1fdde20b70325b06de
This was slightly overengineered ever since I4b1f890 and slowly became
more and more complicated over time, notably when withConsecutive was
replaced in Icb951b4. Turns out this was never really needed. It's
impossible to get more than one tracking category from this code path.
While we might add more tracking categories later that will most
probably not happen in this code path.
Change-Id: Ie32d17bac8d3518c985b18f83a846c3fb2bd053f
Same arguments as in Iafa2412. The one reason to use more detailled
per-method @covers annotations is to avoid "accidental coverage"
where code is marked as being covered by tests that don't assert
anything that would be meaningful for this code. This is especially a
problem with older, bigger classes with lots of side effects.
But all the new classes we introduced over the years are small, with
predictable, local effects.
That's also why we keep the more detailled @covers annotations for
the original Cite class.
Bug: T353227
Bug: T353269
Change-Id: I69850f4d740d8ad5a7c2368b9068dc91e47cc797
Both Language and Parser are extremely complex classes with hundreds
of public methods. We really want to make sure we are not depending
on anything unexpected from these classes. If calls are made into
these classes we want to know exactly what is called.
Doing this also showed that some mocked methods are not even needed.
Change-Id: Icdfff6c07be78a47bf7cadb1813a72581a51272a
This is mostly because recent IDEs can understand createMock() quite
good. We usually don't add such hints every time we use createMock().
We would have a million of them. ;-)
Change-Id: If9e37807a6945c4408d374fc97664cd636020ffd
The structure of this class changed a lot in If2fe5f5
(T239572). This was never reflected in the @covers tags. I
suggest to go with a trivial @covers for the entire class
and let PHPUnit figure it out. The alternative is to kind
of repeat many private implementation details, and this
doesn't feel right.
Change-Id: Ie414876489133ab9aca934c19a5e403cd339abf1
This patch is mostly moving code around without changing the behavior.
Exceptions:
* The ErrorReporter creates a <span> container. This was previously
parsed. The only benefit might be error checking and escaping. Rather
pointless. The code just created this HTML. With this patch, it is not
parsed any more. The unit test reflects this change. The output in
production will not change, as the parser tests show.
* Parsing of the message key (to detect it's type and id) is simplified
a lot, using explode. With this the code can, in theory, support more
types.
Bug: T239572
Change-Id: If2fe5f55db46dfc7e0ce445348608bef00bec64e
The name of the base class in tests is guaranteed to only occur a
single time in a file. There is not much value in making it relative,
and requiring it to appear in the use section. Especially because it
is in the root namespace.
This reflects what I once encoded in the sniff
https://github.com/wmde/WikibaseCodeSniffer/blob/master/Wikibase/Sniffs/Namespaces/FullQualifiedClassNameSniff.php
I wish we could pick this rule and use it in our codebases. But it
seems it is to specific and can't be applied on all codebases, hence
it can't become part of the upstream MediaWiki rule set. At least not
at the moment.
Change-Id: I77c2490c565b7a468c5c944301fc684d20206ec4
