wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-Cite
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/mediawiki/extensions/Cite synced 2024-11-14 18:45:12 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
mediawiki-extensions-Cite/tests/parser/citeSmokeTests.txt

96 lines
5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add smoke tests for previously uncovered combinations I noticed a possible issue related to the $this->refSequence counter in the patch Ida9612d. Some of these counters might get messes up, but there was never a test that checked what will happen to the *next* reference then. I checked the test cases in this patch with a very old version of the codebase. Change-Id: If6e56f727dce5d0e5e38e048e602437597248a42
2019-11-27 15:31:53 +00:00
!! test
Smoke test for duplicated references with the same text
!! wikitext
<ref name="a">text</ref>
<ref name="a">text</ref>
<ref name="b">other</ref>
!! html
<p><sup id="cite_ref-a_1-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
</p>
<sup id="cite_ref-b_2-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-b-2">&#91;2&#93;</a></sup><div class="mw-references-wrap"><ol class="references">
<li id="cite_note-a-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">↑ <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-0">1.0</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-1">1.1</a></sup></span> <span class="reference-text">text</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-b-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><a href="#cite_ref-b_2-0">↑</a></span> <span class="reference-text">other</span>
</li>
</ol></div>
!! end
!! test
Smoke test for duplicated references with conflicting text
!! wikitext
<ref name="a">text</ref>
<ref name="a">bad</ref>
<ref name="b">other</ref>
!! html
<p><sup id="cite_ref-a_1-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
</p>
<sup id="cite_ref-b_2-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-b-2">&#91;2&#93;</a></sup><div class="mw-references-wrap"><ol class="references">
<li id="cite_note-a-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">↑ <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-0">1.0</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-1">1.1</a></sup></span> <span class="reference-text">text <span class="error mw-ext-cite-error" lang="en" dir="ltr">Cite error: Invalid <code>&lt;ref&gt;</code> tag; name "a" defined multiple times with different content</span></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-b-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><a href="#cite_ref-b_2-0">↑</a></span> <span class="reference-text">other</span>
</li>
</ol></div>
!! end
!! test
Smoke test for references that are reused *before* defined in the text
Stop formatting "1.2" as "1,2" in languages like German The new extends="…" feature is using numbers like "1.2". These should be localized in languages like Hebrew that uses other symbols for the digits. But the "." should not change. The existing feature when a <ref> is reused multiple times does have the same "issue". But it seems this is intentional, because it is covered by a test. Note this is not visible in German, because German uses custom labels "a", "b", and so on. This patch also improves the so called "smoke" tests and makes one cover numbers up to "1,10" for a <ref> that is reused that often. Bug: T239725 Change-Id: Iffcb56e1c7be09cefed9dabb1d6391eb6ad995ce
2019-12-04 08:10:03 +00:00
!! options
language=de
Add smoke tests for previously uncovered combinations I noticed a possible issue related to the $this->refSequence counter in the patch Ida9612d. Some of these counters might get messes up, but there was never a test that checked what will happen to the *next* reference then. I checked the test cases in this patch with a very old version of the codebase. Change-Id: If6e56f727dce5d0e5e38e048e602437597248a42
2019-11-27 15:31:53 +00:00
!! wikitext
<ref name="a" />
Stop formatting "1.2" as "1,2" in languages like German The new extends="…" feature is using numbers like "1.2". These should be localized in languages like Hebrew that uses other symbols for the digits. But the "." should not change. The existing feature when a <ref> is reused multiple times does have the same "issue". But it seems this is intentional, because it is covered by a test. Note this is not visible in German, because German uses custom labels "a", "b", and so on. This patch also improves the so called "smoke" tests and makes one cover numbers up to "1,10" for a <ref> that is reused that often. Bug: T239725 Change-Id: Iffcb56e1c7be09cefed9dabb1d6391eb6ad995ce
2019-12-04 08:10:03 +00:00
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
Add smoke tests for previously uncovered combinations I noticed a possible issue related to the $this->refSequence counter in the patch Ida9612d. Some of these counters might get messes up, but there was never a test that checked what will happen to the *next* reference then. I checked the test cases in this patch with a very old version of the codebase. Change-Id: If6e56f727dce5d0e5e38e048e602437597248a42
2019-11-27 15:31:53 +00:00
<ref name="a">text</ref>
<ref name="b">other</ref>
!! html
<p><sup id="cite_ref-a_1-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
Stop formatting "1.2" as "1,2" in languages like German The new extends="…" feature is using numbers like "1.2". These should be localized in languages like Hebrew that uses other symbols for the digits. But the "." should not change. The existing feature when a <ref> is reused multiple times does have the same "issue". But it seems this is intentional, because it is covered by a test. Note this is not visible in German, because German uses custom labels "a", "b", and so on. This patch also improves the so called "smoke" tests and makes one cover numbers up to "1,10" for a <ref> that is reused that often. Bug: T239725 Change-Id: Iffcb56e1c7be09cefed9dabb1d6391eb6ad995ce
2019-12-04 08:10:03 +00:00
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-7" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-8" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-9" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-10" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
Add smoke tests for previously uncovered combinations I noticed a possible issue related to the $this->refSequence counter in the patch Ida9612d. Some of these counters might get messes up, but there was never a test that checked what will happen to the *next* reference then. I checked the test cases in this patch with a very old version of the codebase. Change-Id: If6e56f727dce5d0e5e38e048e602437597248a42
2019-11-27 15:31:53 +00:00
</p>
<sup id="cite_ref-b_2-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-b-2">&#91;2&#93;</a></sup><div class="mw-references-wrap"><ol class="references">
Stop formatting "1.2" as "1,2" in languages like German The new extends="…" feature is using numbers like "1.2". These should be localized in languages like Hebrew that uses other symbols for the digits. But the "." should not change. The existing feature when a <ref> is reused multiple times does have the same "issue". But it seems this is intentional, because it is covered by a test. Note this is not visible in German, because German uses custom labels "a", "b", and so on. This patch also improves the so called "smoke" tests and makes one cover numbers up to "1,10" for a <ref> that is reused that often. Bug: T239725 Change-Id: Iffcb56e1c7be09cefed9dabb1d6391eb6ad995ce
2019-12-04 08:10:03 +00:00
<li id="cite_note-a-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">↑ <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-0">1,00</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-1">1,01</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-2">1,02</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-3">1,03</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-4">1,04</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-5">1,05</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-6">1,06</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-7">1,07</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-8">1,08</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-9">1,09</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-10">1,10</a></sup></span> <span class="reference-text">text</span>
Add smoke tests for previously uncovered combinations I noticed a possible issue related to the $this->refSequence counter in the patch Ida9612d. Some of these counters might get messes up, but there was never a test that checked what will happen to the *next* reference then. I checked the test cases in this patch with a very old version of the codebase. Change-Id: If6e56f727dce5d0e5e38e048e602437597248a42
2019-11-27 15:31:53 +00:00
</li>
<li id="cite_note-b-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><a href="#cite_ref-b_2-0">↑</a></span> <span class="reference-text">other</span>
</li>
</ol></div>
!! end
!! test
Smoke test for references that are reused *before* defined in <references>
!! wikitext
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="a" />
<ref name="b">other</ref>
<references>
<ref name="a">text</ref>
</references>
!! html
<p><sup id="cite_ref-a_1-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-a_1-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-a-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup>
<sup id="cite_ref-b_2-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-b-2">&#91;2&#93;</a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-references-wrap"><ol class="references">
<li id="cite_note-a-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">↑ <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-0">1.0</a></sup> <sup><a href="#cite_ref-a_1-1">1.1</a></sup></span> <span class="reference-text">text</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-b-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><a href="#cite_ref-b_2-0">↑</a></span> <span class="reference-text">other</span>
</li>
</ol></div>
!! end
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink