Oversighted/deleted edits and log actions were entirely accessible to
non-oversighters via AbuseFilter/examine for RC, and via AbuseFilter/test.
Now, we take into account the revision/log visibility and user permissions to
determine what to show.
Other changes in this patch:
*Show the examine link if and only if the user can examine the given row
*If a revision is hidden but the user can see it, don't hide its elements in
ChangesList (only leave them striked/greyed)
*Make APIs better understand revision visibility.
*Make a clear distinction between deleted and suppressed edits/log
entries.
Co-authored with rxy <git@rxy.jp>
Bug: T207085
Change-Id: Icfa48e366a7e5e3abd5d2155ecfddfc09b378088
Check if the entry is deleted first, since it's the strongest deletion
here (oversight level). Bonus: don't use implicit conversion when
checking the return value of SpecialAbuseLog::isHidden.
Bug: T200644
Change-Id: Ie5c4575ad29fe3dcb85a26cc74f1c59207df2852
The function used to determine if a row is hidden has three possible
return values: true, false and "implicit". While the first and the
second one refer to AF own suppressing system, 'implicit' means that the
revision associated with the log entry is deleted. However, we checked
for such return value with a boolean cast, which caused true and
'implicit' to be equally treated, thus hiding revdel'ed revisions to
sysops. Bonus: fixed a comment typo.
Bug: T191699
Change-Id: I87d3a6437bb966198175e4bfd063e30ed79c345f
Now the required need will be abusefilter-modify OR
abusefilter-view-private for /tools, /test and /examine.
Bug: T193903
Change-Id: I3f1a91a2cc1df2272e5d4099cefd7c649a0683d5
This should fix every error with excluded rules, leaving only the one
for $wgTitle. A double check would be nice in order to avoid regressions
due to stupid mistakes.
Bug: T178007
Change-Id: I22c179f3a01d652640304b59e43fcb5b5a9abac3
Yes, this is a sniff bug - however, ideally every variable should
be on its own line with documentation anyway.
Change-Id: Ic8a96d9ea4dd20d8f689aac0a7dece01a4208929
Standardized Special:AbuseFilter/test and /examine/# to OOUI. They need
to be updated together, since they share the same load filter button
(now centralized) which needs to be handled in a different way.
Bug: T132284
Bug: T58367
Bug: T58368
Depends-On: If3d6a994142e34686bb7fc9f09093f751b599485
Change-Id: Ib935e8c9706e987468e52ec2ad1c7219b35fb9d5
Various selectFields() methods were deprecated in MediaWiki core change
Idcfd1556, replaced with getQueryInfo() methods.
Change-Id: If75d2e76c2f166bc40a544dd502da43171ce1e7b
Depends-On: Idcfd15568489d9f03a7ba4460e96610d33bc4089
It should have been deleted in I02ba4ce31b6aca5b7324114093f8ece143abc295
but accidentally survived.
Change-Id: Icdbe8fb0154513d643905f7f8bd6391780cd44a7
- Use rc_source with values that we know we support. In
particular, this drops categorization changes.
- Filter on rc_log_type and rc_log_action (which itself
may be shared across types).
- Use the same query on both Special:AbuseFilter/test
and Special:AbuseFilter/examine.
Bug: T170574
Change-Id: I79b903b4424d3c15095a1e0491d35f6e005db0b8
