This solves two issues described in bug T360909:
* Usage of unsafe characters that have to be
manually reviewed in translations.
* Incorect display of some functions and
operators in RTL UI languages.
It also reduces the translators' need to copy
those operators and functions, which are always
identical to English.
Finally, this patch adds those consistently to all
the messages. Some messages didn't mention them
for an unspecified reason, and now they are mentioned
everywhere.
Bug: T360909
Change-Id: I3283c91b6b1d5fe9b48b1477cd454d9def3a7ded
A custom API error code and data similar to those used when an edit is
blocked by a normal AbuseFilter filter were accidentally added when
the feature was introduced. They should not be there, as the blocked
domains feature is not a normal AbuseFilter filter.
Hopefully nobody is relying on the format of this API response yet.
This commit changes the action=edit response for this case from:
{
"error": {
"code": "abusefilter-disallowed",
"info": "The text you wanted to publish was blocked by our filter. The following domain is blocked from being added: example.edu",
"abusefilter": {
"id": "blockeddomain",
"description": "blockeddomain",
"actions": "disallow"
}
}
}
to:
{
"error": {
"code": "abusefilter-blocked-domains-attempted",
"info": "The text you wanted to publish was blocked by our filter. The following domain is blocked from being added: example.edu"
}
}
Change-Id: I61ccc8f44b63e5cd0f11b1fe9a00ff60104a6249
This was changed to /CodeEditor/modules/lib/ace in 46ee5c493
and is breaking CTRL-F search and other features.
Bug: T362813
Change-Id: Ie1e2a5dc32a7f5c6275a64651e5230ad801d5455
Instead of having separate methods for each variable,
have one method which can work not only with "_links",
but with any array of strings.
Change-Id: I05f1b1cbd15f283b314c72259f183f7788e4e214
Follows-up I5a5420df13893386.
> We lose useful coverage and waste valuable time on keeping tags
> accurate through refactors (or worse, forget to do so).
>
> Tracking tiny per-method details wastes time in realizing (and
> fixing) when people inevitably don't keep them in sync, and time
> lost in finding uncovered code to write tests to realize it was
> already covered but "not yet claimed".
>
> Given all used methods are de-facto and liberally claimed, and
> that we keep the coverage limited to the subject class, this
> maintains the spirit and intent. PHPUnit offers a more precise
> tool when you need it (i.e. when testing legacy monster classes),
> but for well-written code, the class-wide tag suffices.
Ref https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/owner:Krinkle+is:merged+message:Widen
Change-Id: If7304d8b5b43ab8a051fbcecced331a787bab960
It is a common pattern to avoid SELECT * and use the fields used by
the application to avoid loading to much data into memory and maybe use
performance benefits when fields are covered by index.
Change-Id: I08a399f1b6a66442317b151be5386c9d2485f1fb
> We lose useful coverage and waste valuable time on keeping tags
> accurate through refactors (or worse, forget to do so).
>
> Tracking tiny per-method details wastes time in realizing (and
> fixing) when people inevitably don't keep them in sync, and time
> lost in finding uncovered code to write tests to realize it was
> already covered but "not yet claimed".
>
> Given all used methods are de-facto and liberally claimed, and
> that we keep the coverage limited to the subject class, this
> maintains the spirit and intent. PHPUnit offers a more precise
> tool when you need it (i.e. when testing legacy monster classes),
> but for well-written code, the class-wide tag suffices.
Ref https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/owner:Krinkle+is:merged+message:Widen
Change-Id: I5a5420df1389338644a099ebfd072063653e6849
