Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statement done manually
Change-Id: If80031678a474157e4cc78a3d3621dab53aded67
- Define `abusefilter-protected-vars-log` as an available right as
it wasn't already
- Give the `sysop` group the `abusefilter-access-protected-vars` and
`abusefilter-protected-vars-log` rights
Bug: T369610
Change-Id: I44d3824e3d47ad94e8a94e185997c4a8e9d50199
Depends-On: Id8898c17396af0f59ef2d82967e7d85ae4f0cd88
- abusefilter-blocked-domains-intro: link to Special:Log/abusefilterblockeddomainhit
- log-description-abusefilterblockeddomainhit: link to Special:BlockedExternalDomains
Bug: T376506
Change-Id: If21c6e2de8b9d524d5299487f58a09d2a8d53720
To hint to translators that gender can be used,
and to avoid warnings on translatewiki about
missing parameters.
Change-Id: Ie9523527d1ce138f978145ddaa565137a7b34ab1
Like CheckUser, AbuseFilter should also log when specific protected
logs are viewed.
- Add support for debouncing logs to reduce log spam
- Log when AbuseFilterViewExamine with protected variables available
is accessed
- Log when SpecialAbuseLog with protected variables available is
accessed
- Log when QueryAbuseLog with protected variables available is accessed
Bug: T365743
Change-Id: If31a71ea5c7e2dd7c5d26ad37dc474787a7d5b1a
CVE-2024-PENDING
Why:
* The 'abusefiltercheckmatch' API allows callers to match
arbitary filter conditions against existing AbuseFilter logs
* The API does not check if the performer has the ability to
see the log details for the given filter, so can allow a user
to bypass hidden and protected visibility settings.
What:
* Call AbuseFilterPermissionManager::canSeeLogDetailsForFilter
before attempting to match a filter against a given AbuseFilter
log.
* Add a test to verify that this security fix works.
Bug: T372998
Change-Id: I4a2467dc4e0d1f8401d5428a89c7f6d6ebcdfa70
- Fix an issue where if a user didn't have view permissions they could
get the preference check error (a preference they wouldn't have) on
SpecialAbuseLog
- Fix an issue where the `change-access` hadn't been updated to the used
disabled/enabled log types
- Fix an issue where a ProtectedVarsAccessLoggerTest test wasn't
correctly using the data provider data
- Improve naming since ProtectedVarsAccessLogger exists in its own test
file instead of being a subset of tests on AbuseLoggerTest
Bug: T371798
Change-Id: I53f22855e63d9e1339361a5c9ee7886e0f74714a
This change is needed to unblock a change in core to the markup.
(I0195d4b0f790f6595cc626a6db96b4fc6380a0f4). The current markup
in core is loading additional CSS styles to support legacy
markup.
Bug: T360668
Change-Id: I4bd1a8a9d4eda1b3e89d067d6671d3f8bad4f584
Write logs related to temporary accounts to CheckUser if the extension
is available so that logs are topically centralized.
Bug: T373525
Depends-On: I35d50df7cd6754e29d964cc716fb3c42406272df
Change-Id: Ic95f211f4db7ce6dc2d769d2f3af206f4a3935e4
Similar to how CheckUser logs access to IP information about temporary
accounts, AbuseFilter needs to log whenever protected variables are
accessed.
- Implement ProtectedVarsAccessLogger which handles access logging
- Log whenever a user changes their ability to access protected
variables via Special:Preferences
Bug: T371798
Change-Id: Ic7024d9c5f369eb33c4198a59638de9a1d58b04b
Users need to enable a preference before gaining access to the IPs
from `user_unnamed_ip`, a protected variable.
- Add a preference that the user can check to toggle their access
- Check for the preference and the view right for logs that reveal
protected variables on:
+ AbuseFilterViewExamine
+ SpecialAbuseLog
+ QueryAbuseLog
Bug: T371798
Change-Id: I5363380d999118982b216585ea73ee4274a6eac1
Small performance benefit by just one db call instead of multiple
Most test cases only use one filter, but some 2 to 4
Change-Id: I498c447e3873d2138e21541467115c9a67bb909e
AF rules don't support associative arrays, so the named capturing groups are provided in the array only by their numeric keys.
Bug: T374294
Change-Id: I53b39917e6677f3a5b8f68bcf0faebf48668ea27
