Some exposed variables (eg. `user_ip`) used in filters are sensitive
and need to only be available to restricted groups of users.
Back-end changes:
- Add `AbuseFilterProtectedVariables` which defines what variables are
protected by the new right `abusefilter-access-protected-vars`
- Add the concept of a `protected` variable, the use of which will
denote the entire filter as protected via a flag on `af_hidden`
New UX features:
- Display changes to the protected status of filters on history and diff
pages
- Check for protected variables and the right to see them in filter
validation and don't allow a filter to be saved if it uses a variable
that the user doesn't have access to
- Check for the right to view protected variables before allowing access
and edits to existing filters that use them
Bug: T364465
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I828bbb4015e87040f69a8e10c7888273c4f24dd3
Protected variables will cause the filter using them to become
protected as well. `af_hidden` can be used to track this flag,
as it is a TINYINT and can be converted into a bitmask with no
schema changes.
This is not a backwards-compatible change, as now all checks must
check the `hidden` flag specifically or otherwise will be cast to
true if any flag is set.
To support this change:
- "hidden" is considered a flag set in the `af_hidden`. This is a
change in concept with no need for updates to the column values,
as there is currently only one flag in the bitmask.
- `Flag`s store the bitmask as well as the state of single flags
and can return either.
- Any checks against the `af_hidden` value no longer check a
boolean value and instead now check the `hidden` flag value.
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I358205cb1119cf1e4004892c37e36e0c0a864f37
The BadMethodCallException is documented as "thrown if a callback
refers to an undefined method or if some arguments are missing".
This is not what happens in these places.
Change-Id: Ic95b67acc2e17eea1dd0fa1d72f9ac94a86bcf17
Some pieces of code were updated to use Filter objects, while other
places are still to be updated. We also need to change the history part
to exclude actions somehow, cleanup the ViewEdit, reduce direct DB
access or anything mentioning DB fields outside of FilterLookup, etc.
Change-Id: I42b7ded685db76eddd45e4b1336f9828cba811ce
This is just a start; next step is adding a factory/store method to
get/store these objects. And then use these value objects whenever
applicable.
Note: the actions-related code is still not fully implemented. This is
going to happen as part of the FilterLookup.
Change-Id: I5f33227887c035e301313bbe24d1c1fefb75bc6a
