Protected variables will cause the filter using them to become
protected as well. `af_hidden` can be used to track this flag,
as it is a TINYINT and can be converted into a bitmask with no
schema changes.
This is not a backwards-compatible change, as now all checks must
check the `hidden` flag specifically or otherwise will be cast to
true if any flag is set.
To support this change:
- "hidden" is considered a flag set in the `af_hidden`. This is a
change in concept with no need for updates to the column values,
as there is currently only one flag in the bitmask.
- `Flag`s store the bitmask as well as the state of single flags
and can return either.
- Any checks against the `af_hidden` value no longer check a
boolean value and instead now check the `hidden` flag value.
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I358205cb1119cf1e4004892c37e36e0c0a864f37
$wgAbuseFilterActions shouldn't be used normally, as it excludes actions
registered by other extensions.
Note: mw:Extension:AbuseFilter#Integration_with_other_extensions should
be updated after merging.
Bug: T239348
Change-Id: I89b3f0228eacdf145e8f2dd2a5602d0c7ce75a86
The scope is still quite limited, but as noted in a todo, we might want
to make this completely independent from the database, and add the use
case of ViewDiff.
Change-Id: Ie980fff0983b3e86037265e85da04444c809a6e8
