Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statement done manually
Change-Id: If80031678a474157e4cc78a3d3621dab53aded67
Similar to how CheckUser logs access to IP information about temporary
accounts, AbuseFilter needs to log whenever protected variables are
accessed.
- Implement ProtectedVarsAccessLogger which handles access logging
- Log whenever a user changes their ability to access protected
variables via Special:Preferences
Bug: T371798
Change-Id: Ic7024d9c5f369eb33c4198a59638de9a1d58b04b
Users need to enable a preference before gaining access to the IPs
from `user_unnamed_ip`, a protected variable.
- Add a preference that the user can check to toggle their access
- Check for the preference and the view right for logs that reveal
protected variables on:
+ AbuseFilterViewExamine
+ SpecialAbuseLog
+ QueryAbuseLog
Bug: T371798
Change-Id: I5363380d999118982b216585ea73ee4274a6eac1
Why:
- The previous attempt to integrate AbuseFilter with ConfirmEdit set
a flag on the request object
(I110a5f5321649dcf85993a0c209ab70b9886057c) didn't work in WMF
production because in WMF, we load ConfirmEdit first, followed by
AbuseFilter. Therefore any flag set in an AbuseFilter hook is ignored
by ConfirmEdit
What:
- Remove implementation of ConfirmEditTriggersCaptchaHook, as this does
not work when AbuseFilter is loaded after ConfirmEdit.
- Repurpose onConfirmEditTriggersCaptcha to handle non-edit actions only
- Implement the EditFilterMergedContent hook and call SimpleCaptcha's
public confirmEditMerged method if CaptchaConsequence has specified
that a CAPTCHA should be displayed, and if the CAPTCHA has not already
been solved
Soft-Depends-On: Idc47bdae8007da938f31e1c0f33e9be4813f41d7
Bug: T20110
Change-Id: I7dd3a7c41606dcf5123518c2d3d0f4355f5edfd3
MediaWiki has never used this path for running the maintenance
scripts, only the class name provided in the other parameter.
Providing the parameter is no longer needed in MediaWiki 1.43.
Bug: T367918
Change-Id: Ie098fa124039cc1122135cae72c74579d43dc04f
Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statement done manually
Change-Id: I48fcc02c61d423c9c5111ae545634fdc5c5cc710
First patch in a series of dropping the old columns.
Wikis now need to run the maintenance script (e.g., via
update.php) prior to serving this commit.
Wikimedia wikis are already on SCHEMA_COMPAT_NEW stage.
Bug: T188180
Change-Id: I86ec2b816eed17b62bf02bfd085570f132011b3e
Why:
- We want AbuseFilter to able to require a CAPTCHA if an action
matches conditions in an AbuseFilter
What:
- Implement the ConfirmEditTriggersCaptcha hook, and check to see if
the CaptchaConsequence set a global flag that indicates if we
should show a CAPTCHA
Depends-On: Ie87e3d850541c7dc44aaeb6b30489a32a0c8cc60
Bug: T20110
Change-Id: I110a5f5321649dcf85993a0c209ab70b9886057c
A custom API error code and data similar to those used when an edit is
blocked by a normal AbuseFilter filter were accidentally added when
the feature was introduced. They should not be there, as the blocked
domains feature is not a normal AbuseFilter filter.
Hopefully nobody is relying on the format of this API response yet.
This commit changes the action=edit response for this case from:
{
"error": {
"code": "abusefilter-disallowed",
"info": "The text you wanted to publish was blocked by our filter. The following domain is blocked from being added: example.edu",
"abusefilter": {
"id": "blockeddomain",
"description": "blockeddomain",
"actions": "disallow"
}
}
}
to:
{
"error": {
"code": "abusefilter-blocked-domains-attempted",
"info": "The text you wanted to publish was blocked by our filter. The following domain is blocked from being added: example.edu"
}
}
Change-Id: I61ccc8f44b63e5cd0f11b1fe9a00ff60104a6249
Constructing a Status like this does not make sense (and I want
to deprecate it in I0675e557bb93a1c990fa923c50b9f6ee8a9836c8),
because the parameters are ignored by most Status methods:
$error = Message::newFromSpecifier( 'abusefilter-blocked-domains-attempted' );
$status = Status::newFatal( $error, 'blockeddomain', 'blockeddomain' );
But it worked here, because FilteredActionsHandler::getApiStatus()
used a deprecated method that allowed inspecting them.
I feel like this code in BlockedDomainFilter has been added to make
the tests pass without thinking about what it actually does, which is
to output a bunch of useless incorrect data in API errors.
I'm not sure if we can remove that now without breaking API
compatibility, so add the useless data in FilteredActionsHandler
instead, closer to where it's output.
Change-Id: Ic12241bd3029bc1b0e7a0023689a2be35ccd30a8
From Status class documentation:
> The recommended pattern for Status objects is to return a Status object
> unconditionally, i.e. both on success and on failure -- so that the
> developer of the calling code is reminded that the function can fail, and
> so that a lack of error-handling will be explicit.
Change-Id: Ie6a55e297a35374fbdef880dd40e65f5cd00b6bf
This patch solves a pending TODO which is to remove the ::factory()
method from the AutoPromoteGroupsHandler class. If the cache instance
is injected, we'll use it otherwise we'll default to a HashBagOStuff.
Bug: T358346
Change-Id: I2bc414da8733431d1d11025e954282fc7c73aa80
This feature never worked very well, and the original wish
https://w.wiki/7ZsE didn't ask for a 2010 editor solution, anyway.
Rather than have AbuseFilterBlockedExternalDomainsNotification linger in
an unstable state, we remove the code entirely.
Bug: T347435
Follow-Up: I7eae55f12da9ee58be5786bfc153e549b09598e7
Change-Id: I88e87c4e0a2968b892394461b1227f4d15938e8e
Why:
* When CheckUser asks the AbuseFilter extension for modifications
to rows inserted into the CheckUser tables, the AbuseFilter
extension attempts to get the Filter user via User::newSystemUser
* User::newSystemUser can deadlock if multiple requests to create
the system user are being made at once.
* The CheckUserHander does not need to create the abuse filter system
and instead only needs to know if a given $user is the equal to
the FilterUser.
* As such the FilterUser service needs to provide a way to check if
a given $user is equal without creating the FilterUser.
What:
* Add FilterUser::isUserSameAs which returns a boolean value
indicating whether the Abuse Filter system user is the equal
to a given UserIdentity in the same way that UserIdentity::equals
is implemented.
* Refactor ::getUser to get the username for the filter user in
a separate method, so that the ::isUserSameAs method can also
use this method. Name this new method ::getFilterUserName.
* Add a test for the FilterUser service to ensure consistent test
coverage
* Convert the @covers and @coversDefaultClass annotations to be
a @covers for the class. This is because PHPUnit recommends this in
https://docs.phpunit.de/en/9.6/annotations.html#appendixes-annotations-covers-tables-annotations
Bug: T356275
Bug: T346967
Change-Id: I8a101781bb47612deabb0f2a06a398ac13e860e6
This field gets added automatically when using the special page form but
is only shown to admins and other people who have access. It's not private
information (users can find it in history) but this is to avoid making
these admins an easy target for harassment (Talking to PM of moderation
team he agreed this is a good compromise).
Bug: T341626
Change-Id: I8410f39db54b96981b05de8e064fed65df30ef2f
This requires 1.42 for some new names
Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statements and changes to docs done manually
Change-Id: Ic1e2c9a0c891382744e4792bba1effece48e53f3
This leverages the new BlockedExternalDomains system that is now part of
AbuseFilter. It notifies editors in realtime if a link they add is
blocked. See https://w.wiki/7ZsF for more information.
BlockedExternalDomains is slated to have its own API tantamount to the
action=spamblacklist endpoint, after which case this code will need to be
updated. In the meantime, it's meant to serve as a minimal viable product
for the CWS 2023 wish <https://w.wiki/7ZsE> for wikitext users.
The new $wgAbuseFilterBlockedExternalDomainsNotification configuration
setting controls the availability of this feature.
A similar feature for VisaulEditor is tracked at T276857
Bug: T347435
Change-Id: I7eae55f12da9ee58be5786bfc153e549b09598e7
Most notably, make it not use additional DB tables to test global
filters. Instead, just pretend that the local database is not local (via
config) and "hide" local filters with a simple test-only flag in
FilterLookup.
Change-Id: Ib431dbf6c9d84978ee84e7f0671cfcbf8a54d7a2
I'm planning to add support for bypass and regex-based blocking which
means it'll grow a bit. So let's give it a dedicated class.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I5a6fe2fd2f1efdebd8cada0ba6c481341f830e27
Unlike what the 20-year old source comments in UrlUtils.php would
have you believe, parse_url() works fine nowadays, including for
protocol-relative URLs and indeed lots of prod code uses it directly.
The class still has some convenience value for case where you need to
expand or manipulate URLs, but for the common case of extracting a part
of it, you really don't need it.
Test plan:
$ php phpunit.php ../../extensions/AbuseFilter/tests/phpunit/integration/FilteredActionsHandlerTest.php
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I1e76d2f5aef65365743214530faba656325b965a
This is basically copy paste of SpamBlacklist logging with the added
extra bit of what triggered the hit.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: Ieb9e3ca615af88ab56735b56e24c80c42a68d478
Regarding array building: Instead of adding to array with
$array[] = 'foo' and then doing array_flip(), simply do
$array['foo'] = true;
Regarding tests: I originally wanted to create a unit test but I ended
up mocking so many things that it wasn't worth it and the config variable
is globaly which first we need to clean up after deployment is done.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: Iac8dca7078668ee3441d19b6aafe499c1aa0d732
We will have a pretty large list of blocked domains that we need to
swift through in each edit for any added domain. In order to cacth
subdomains being added, we have to do all sorts of complicated
operations and string search in large set of strings which is quite
slow. To fix that, let's simply pretend a user who has added
foo.bar.com, also added bar.com and com and do exact match in array of
strings making it much faster.
h/t Krinkle for the idea
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I96795ed7d1a25f051db0b591dde21b032b138ded
For now, we will revisit this in the future. Specially if the
communities think otherwise.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I2847264eba9a3cc4fc47a22eacb523199015f9e7
This makes raw page editing safer, and potentially enables opening up
access to less restricted user groups.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I14f21003a551f34b6e524e9b229613e79b0e5a70
It is behind a feature flag. Improvements on it can happen in follow
ups. The patch is already quite massive.
Bug: T337431
Bug: T279275
Change-Id: I3df949c4d41ce65bb4afa013da9c691ac05fc760
* Set the same block expiry for temp and anon users
* Don't block autopromote for temp users; they can't be autopromoted
* Bail early from CheckUserHandler if the user is temporary
Bug: T335062
Change-Id: I6b72537f568c4c70a0b86f1825ea30b767f5634a
