Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statement done manually
Change-Id: I48fcc02c61d423c9c5111ae545634fdc5c5cc710
Why:
* When CheckUser asks the AbuseFilter extension for modifications
to rows inserted into the CheckUser tables, the AbuseFilter
extension attempts to get the Filter user via User::newSystemUser
* User::newSystemUser can deadlock if multiple requests to create
the system user are being made at once.
* The CheckUserHander does not need to create the abuse filter system
and instead only needs to know if a given $user is the equal to
the FilterUser.
* As such the FilterUser service needs to provide a way to check if
a given $user is equal without creating the FilterUser.
What:
* Add FilterUser::isUserSameAs which returns a boolean value
indicating whether the Abuse Filter system user is the equal
to a given UserIdentity in the same way that UserIdentity::equals
is implemented.
* Refactor ::getUser to get the username for the filter user in
a separate method, so that the ::isUserSameAs method can also
use this method. Name this new method ::getFilterUserName.
* Add a test for the FilterUser service to ensure consistent test
coverage
* Convert the @covers and @coversDefaultClass annotations to be
a @covers for the class. This is because PHPUnit recommends this in
https://docs.phpunit.de/en/9.6/annotations.html#appendixes-annotations-covers-tables-annotations
Bug: T356275
Bug: T346967
Change-Id: I8a101781bb47612deabb0f2a06a398ac13e860e6
These tests were accessing the Database, for mainly 3 reasons:
- User::newSystemUser
- Static methods in ChangeTags
- Echo's Event class
There isn't much we can do about them, so add tests to the Database
group where needed. In some cases, there are already comments that these
tests should be made unit tests once possible.
Bug: T155147
Change-Id: I8a0d52e0a4cae8a4059b62867853a73e60c878a1
For fixing bugs like T65632, T105325, or T264104, we will need
to update code in more than one place at once. To prevent
regressions, create an integration test which tests the whole
pipeline, from the request submission to variable evaluation.
Edits are simulated using action=edit API call because the hook
AbuseFilter uses is run from EditPage.
To increase confidence in test coverage, remove some annotations
from AbuseFilterConsequencesTest or make them less greedy.
Ideally, it would only test consequences.
This patch includes refactoring of AbuseFilterCreateAccountTestTrait
which now only inserts the user into the database if it really
should be created.
It also restores test coverage of some other classes.
Change-Id: I661f4e0e2bcac4770e499708fca4e4e153f31fed
Unfortunately, this isn't using DI completely, because of the
User::newSystemUser call. I'm not even sure if we really need to call it
or we can just stick to new UserIdentityValue, but leaving like this for
now.
Also, the types were weakened to UserIdentity, so the transition is
going to be easy anyway.
Change-Id: I08f8fae0fcc622ff0ac3f86771476d06d1c18549
