This patch includes various fixes to how func arguments are handled in
CachingParser:
- Add a comment about a future improvement of checkSyntax, which we
could limit to try building the AST.
- Having enough args for each function is now also checked when
building the AST. This allows implementing the previous point without
stopping to report notenoughargs at syntaxcheck-time (otherwise it'd be
a runtime error). And it also ensure that we check for the params count
inside skipped branches, e.g. inside if/else: these were already only
discovered at runtime in CachingParser. The old parser is not affected
by this change, because when checking syntax it will always execute
all branches, and at runtime it will skip braces altogether.
- Fix arg count for CachingParser, which previously added a bogus param
in case of a function called without parameters. This was fixed for
the other parser in I484fe2994292970276150d2e417801453339e540, and I
just ported the updated fix. Also note that the CachingParser was
already failing for e.g. `count()`, but instead of complaining about
missing arguments, it failed hard when trying to pass NULL to
evalNode.
- Fixed some tests not to use setExpectedException, which caused the
previous point to remain unnoticed: calling that method prevents the
loop from continuing, and thus only the AbuseFilterParser part was
being executed. The new implementation checks the exception ID and is
thus more future-proof if the i18n message changes.
- Fixed some function names in error reporting for the old parser.
- The arg count is now checked outside of the function handlers, thus
it's no more necessary to call checkEnoughArguments at the beginning
of each handler. This also produces clearer error messages in case of
aliases (e.g. set/set_var).
- Check the args count even if some of the args are DUNDEFINED. This is
much easier now that the check is outside of the handler. This will
make syntax check fail for e.g. `contains_any(added_lines)`.
Bug: T156095
Change-Id: I446a307e5395ea8cc8ec5ca5d5390b074bea2f24
If $parser->parse returns a falsey value (=null), that's because the
filter doesn't have any statement. But that's not a valid reason not to
cache the filter. Hence, return whatever parse() is returning inside the
callback, so that the result is always cached.
Change-Id: Ib6b0e72d882dc484456a3be6bbc74da36ef48bf7
The regression itself was fixed in
I980aec3481a52ecc35f1811a366014a5581a7cdb, so this patch only adds a
test for it.
Also remove a comment about CachingParser failures: we don't want to
encourage people to remove it from tests anymore.
Bug: T152281
Change-Id: I3ad49050ea49bf45d3226878e091da3c8dbefdb1
As explained on phabricator, they don't work with shortcircuit, so they
already fail for all filters using them. Plus IMHO it's an unnecessary
deviation from PHP's behaviour, given that this syntax doesn't do what
users may expect.
Bug: T218906
Change-Id: If9e7545e14044c8dc3b4163bb6fca8ab0683b9fa
Added cachingParser back to *all* the parser tests, fixed a couple of
differences with the normal parser, and added a couple of tests so that
any cachingParser-related file has 100% coverage. Also move the remaining
get_matches tests inside parserTests, and specify the parser used in case of failure.
This also adds a new base class for parser-related tests with a couple
of util methods.
Bug: T201193
Change-Id: I980aec3481a52ecc35f1811a366014a5581a7cdb
Split a method, use WAN cache so that we're enabled to use
getWithSetCallback, pass the "version" option there and adapt the test
to it.
Follow-up of I9b3bc36b552901bc6ca7609ee51e80be2979a9c4
Change-Id: I4dd81a723e2bdb828b90594ad66a3918d8ec5b6c
Since double-equals are evil. I left some of them in place where I
wasn't sure, but I may be changed some which were intended to be
doubles. It could be a good idea to delay merging this patch until we'll
have more code coverage.
Change-Id: I1721a3ba532d481e3ecf35f51099c1438b6b73b2
Arrays were introduced with the name "lists". While it **may** look
user-friendlier and so on, it actually uses a wrong name: lists are
different from arrays. I ran a grep and I should've replaced
every occurrence, plus everything seems to work, however a double check
wouldn't be bad.
Change-Id: I6a858f02f5dd9250ba7e1abf9c6422fd98758c9e
This should fix every error with excluded rules, leaving only the one
for $wgTitle. A double check would be nice in order to avoid regressions
due to stupid mistakes.
Bug: T178007
Change-Id: I22c179f3a01d652640304b59e43fcb5b5a9abac3
