Some exposed variables (eg. `user_ip`) used in filters are sensitive
and need to only be available to restricted groups of users.
Back-end changes:
- Add `AbuseFilterProtectedVariables` which defines what variables are
protected by the new right `abusefilter-access-protected-vars`
- Add the concept of a `protected` variable, the use of which will
denote the entire filter as protected via a flag on `af_hidden`
New UX features:
- Display changes to the protected status of filters on history and diff
pages
- Check for protected variables and the right to see them in filter
validation and don't allow a filter to be saved if it uses a variable
that the user doesn't have access to
- Check for the right to view protected variables before allowing access
and edits to existing filters that use them
Bug: T364465
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I828bbb4015e87040f69a8e10c7888273c4f24dd3
Protected variables will cause the filter using them to become
protected as well. `af_hidden` can be used to track this flag,
as it is a TINYINT and can be converted into a bitmask with no
schema changes.
This is not a backwards-compatible change, as now all checks must
check the `hidden` flag specifically or otherwise will be cast to
true if any flag is set.
To support this change:
- "hidden" is considered a flag set in the `af_hidden`. This is a
change in concept with no need for updates to the column values,
as there is currently only one flag in the bitmask.
- `Flag`s store the bitmask as well as the state of single flags
and can return either.
- Any checks against the `af_hidden` value no longer check a
boolean value and instead now check the `hidden` flag value.
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I358205cb1119cf1e4004892c37e36e0c0a864f37
Almost all callers already provide an Authority in the form
of a User object, so mostly just need to change the typehints
Depends-On: I58661943c7e1acb6ff09798ee1a30be0fde3f459
Change-Id: I2ad86859c8194c14d7331f58db62b7cff4698085
This commit doesn't change any permissions for anybody.
It's the first step to achieve what the task asks for.
Bug: T242821
Change-Id: I8060ca926e6769b11d470fe4037854cda496000d
This moves a lot of things away from the AbuseFilter class. There's a
nasty static dependency on ChangeTags, but it's very limited anyway, and
it's going to be fixed once T245964 is resolved.
Change-Id: Ia7df4b4d3289c2722323f59ceecf3fdd38277785
This requires adjusting some methods to work with Filter objects. Some
methods and tests are left in an inconsistent/suboptimal state, plus some todos
were added, but all of this is going to be remediated in another commit.
Change-Id: Id063ee73d97c7aef56323e1457d99704f77ab943
This commit splits this method into a version that doesn't need a
filter, and another version which requires one. This latter version has
a single mandatory parameter, $filterHidden, and it's up to the callers
to retrieve the value to pass in.
As mentioned in a TODO, this should eventually be changed to take a
Filter object (still under review as
I5f33227887c035e301313bbe24d1c1fefb75bc6a), which is also why
AbuseFilter::filterHidden is not being used here.
Change-Id: Id47a80131e12a5f7e1e93676299641dbf1e2b0ad
This service should act as a mediator between the AF code and the
permission manager, and it should know what are the permissions required
by each action.
Change-Id: Ieb177d9992147b11fa7b8f05929da6c182cc2286
