The UI/UX for acknowledging a filter will be protected/is protected
could be clearer. The checkbox implemented currently doesn't make
it clear that the acknowledgement is mandatory and filters that are
already protected allow for the checkbox to be unchecked even though
that doesn't reflect that the filter cannot be unprotected.
- Update copy for the protected filter acknowledgement to make it clear
that it's a mandatory acknowledgement, not an optional one
- Update copy for the error that shows when a filter that should be
protected doesn't have the acknowledgement checked
- When a filter is already protected, disable the acknowledgement
checkbox to indicate this is not mutable
Bug: T364485
Change-Id: I667fcca4511dff1ac3ca69930c5b5e5eb5001787
- Add a basic checkbox on the filter edit page that must be checked if a
filter uses a protected variable to ensure that the user is aware that
their filter will also become protected
Bug: T364485
Change-Id: I7c7652f7d1a81223229b839ff7eee5da4af74c8a
Some exposed variables (eg. `user_ip`) used in filters are sensitive
and need to only be available to restricted groups of users.
Back-end changes:
- Add `AbuseFilterProtectedVariables` which defines what variables are
protected by the new right `abusefilter-access-protected-vars`
- Add the concept of a `protected` variable, the use of which will
denote the entire filter as protected via a flag on `af_hidden`
New UX features:
- Display changes to the protected status of filters on history and diff
pages
- Check for protected variables and the right to see them in filter
validation and don't allow a filter to be saved if it uses a variable
that the user doesn't have access to
- Check for the right to view protected variables before allowing access
and edits to existing filters that use them
Bug: T364465
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I828bbb4015e87040f69a8e10c7888273c4f24dd3
After temporary accounts are enabled, filters that rely on an ip
in the `user_name` will fail (eg. `ip_in_range` and `ip_in_ranges`).
To keep these filters working:
- Expose the IP through another variable, `user_unnamed_ip`, that can be
used instead of `user_name`.
- The variable is scoped to only reveal the IPs of temporary accounts
and un-logged in users.
- Wikis that don't have temporary accounts enabled will be able to see
this variable but it won't provide information that `user_name`
wasn't already providing
- Introduce the concept of transforming variable values before writing
to the blob store and after retrieval, as IPs need to be deleted from
the logs eventually and can't be stored as-is in the amend-only blob
store
Bug: T357772
Change-Id: I8c11e06ccb9e78b9a991e033fe43f5dded8f7bb2
This solves two issues described in bug T360909:
* Usage of unsafe characters that have to be
manually reviewed in translations.
* Incorect display of some functions and
operators in RTL UI languages.
It also reduces the translators' need to copy
those operators and functions, which are always
identical to English.
Finally, this patch adds those consistently to all
the messages. Some messages didn't mention them
for an unspecified reason, and now they are mentioned
everywhere.
Bug: T360909
Change-Id: I3283c91b6b1d5fe9b48b1477cd454d9def3a7ded
Make the order of the messages that describe
operators and functions in the en.json file
identical to their order in
KeywordManager::BUILDER_VALUES, which is also
their order in the actual UI of the filter editor.
This only reorders the mesages in the en.json file.
It's not supposed to change anything in
the end users' experience, but it will change
the order in which translators on translatewiki.net
see them.
This is a cleanup step towards removing
the explicit operators from the messages,
as suggested in T360909, and this reordering
is hopefully useful even without that change,
for general consistency.
Comments about particular messages:
* abusefilter-edit-builder-vars-timestamp-expanded
is moved to the very end because, despite its key,
it's not actually used in the filter builder.
* old-text, old-html, and minor-edit are moved towards
the end because they are outdated. They are listed
separately from BUILDER_VALUES and they are not used
in the filter builder UI, but they are used in the logs
of previous actions. This patch adds a code comment
for the benefit of developers who touch that code
in the future.
Bug: T360909
Change-Id: I86ecdca5a6173b9068d5e968e69c57c74a379888
Why:
* An AbuseFilter variable is needed that allows filters to determine
what type the current user is. That is, whether the user is an
IP address, temporary account, named user or external user.
* Currently filters implement this by inspecting the value in
the 'user_name' variable, but this is likely to break when
temporary accounts are enabled as IPs would be hidden.
* Giving a dedicated variable that indicates the type of the user
allows filters to work out this information without having to
know the specific username of the user before performing the
check.
What:
* Add the 'user_type' variable which is lazily computed. It can have
the value 'named', 'temp', 'ip' or 'external' depending on the
type of the user. If the user does not match any of these, then
the value is 'unknown'.
* Replace call to deprecated User::newFromIdentity with a use of the
UserFactory service that is dependency injected.
* Add and update tests to ensure consistent test coverage.
Bug: T357615
Change-Id: Ifffa891879e7e49d2430a0330116b34c5a03049d
This feature never worked very well, and the original wish
https://w.wiki/7ZsE didn't ask for a 2010 editor solution, anyway.
Rather than have AbuseFilterBlockedExternalDomainsNotification linger in
an unstable state, we remove the code entirely.
Bug: T347435
Follow-Up: I7eae55f12da9ee58be5786bfc153e549b09598e7
Change-Id: I88e87c4e0a2968b892394461b1227f4d15938e8e
This field gets added automatically when using the special page form but
is only shown to admins and other people who have access. It's not private
information (users can find it in history) but this is to avoid making
these admins an easy target for harassment (Talking to PM of moderation
team he agreed this is a good compromise).
Bug: T341626
Change-Id: I8410f39db54b96981b05de8e064fed65df30ef2f
- Mentions filter number and name in the title
- Distinguishes between viewing and editing
Bug: T353106
Change-Id: Idda9854a78937033b168603810154b48288c3f4c
This leverages the new BlockedExternalDomains system that is now part of
AbuseFilter. It notifies editors in realtime if a link they add is
blocked. See https://w.wiki/7ZsF for more information.
BlockedExternalDomains is slated to have its own API tantamount to the
action=spamblacklist endpoint, after which case this code will need to be
updated. In the meantime, it's meant to serve as a minimal viable product
for the CWS 2023 wish <https://w.wiki/7ZsE> for wikitext users.
The new $wgAbuseFilterBlockedExternalDomainsNotification configuration
setting controls the availability of this feature.
A similar feature for VisaulEditor is tracked at T276857
Bug: T347435
Change-Id: I7eae55f12da9ee58be5786bfc153e549b09598e7
These two messages appear at the top of pages such as
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/history/50/diff/prev/27425
The words "Back to" are not really necessary there. It's clear enough
to simply write "Filter editor" and "Filter history", without showing
"Back to" next to each other.
Change-Id: I44672ffd49ba6c24dbf49f9c7de3bbd72f154dbf
This is basically copy paste of SpamBlacklist logging with the added
extra bit of what triggered the hit.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: Ieb9e3ca615af88ab56735b56e24c80c42a68d478
This makes raw page editing safer, and potentially enables opening up
access to less restricted user groups.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I14f21003a551f34b6e524e9b229613e79b0e5a70
It is behind a feature flag. Improvements on it can happen in follow
ups. The patch is already quite massive.
Bug: T337431
Bug: T279275
Change-Id: I3df949c4d41ce65bb4afa013da9c691ac05fc760
Temporary users get the same block expiry as anonymous (IP) users,
since d42b7335d5.
Update the checkbox label to reflect this.
Change-Id: Ibf60936d9c746d857fc4354552d71e1efdd52066
Added support for ip_in_ranges which allow multiple ranges to be
checked at the same time. If the IP is in any of the ranges, the
function returns true.
Bug: T305017
Change-Id: Ic75c87ecd4cacf47ce2ff1b04173405230ff81d0
- Use a /64 range for IPv6 instead of /16.
- Fix a curious and serious bug for IPv6, where grouping by range
would only use the first (!) number of the IP address, due to the
'v6-' prefix returned by IP::toHex.
- Fail hard if the identifier is unknown -- it's not something that's
supposed to happen.
- Include the type name in each identifier, instead of prefixing all
type names to all identifiers. This makes it easier to understand the
parts of the key.
- Test the whole lot.
Bug: T211101
Change-Id: I54c4209f2f0d5a4c5e7b81bed240ca3e28a2ded7
List which actions were disabled, or explicitly say that no actions were
disabled if that's the case. Also avoid the word "throttle" in messages
as it may be hard to translate. Also don't suggest optimizations to the
filter conditions -- unoptimized rules have nothing to do with a filter
being throttled.
Bug: T200036
Change-Id: Id989fb185453d068b7685241ee49189a2df67b5f
This commit adds a class AFPSyntaxChecker which can statically analyze
a filter code to detect the following errors:
- unbound variables (which comes in two modes: conservative and liberal,
default to conservative)
- unused variables (disabled by default for compatibilty)
- assignment on built-in identifiers
- function application's arity mismatch
- function application's invalid function name
- non-string literal in the first argument of set / set_var
The existing parser and evaluator are modified as follows:
- The new (caching) evaluator no longer needs to perform variable
hoisting at runtime.
- Note that for array assignment, this changes the semantics.
- The new parser is more lenient, reducing parsing errors.
The static analyzer will catch these errors instead, allowing us
to give a much better error message and reduces the complexity of
the parser.
* The parser now allows function name to be any identifier.
* The parser now allows arity mismatch to occur.
* The parser now allows the first argument of set to be any expression.
Concretely, obvious changes that users will see are:
1. a := [1]; false & (a[] := 2); a[0] === 1
would evaluate to true, while it used to evaluate to the undefined value
due to hoisting
2. f(1)
will now error with 'f is not a valid function' as opposed to
'Unexpected "T_BRACE"'
3. length
will now error with 'Illegal use of built-in identifier "length"'
as opposed to 'Expected a ('
Appendix: conservative and liberal mode
The conservative mode is completely compatible with the current evaluator.
That is,
false & (a := 1); a
will not deem `a` as unbound, though this is actually undesirable because
`a` would then be bound to the troublesome undefined value.
The liberal mode rejects the above pattern by deeming `a` as unbound.
However, it also rejects
true & (a := 1); a
even though (a := 1) is always executed. Since there are several filters
in Wikimedia projects that rely on this behavior, we default the mode
to conservative for now.
Note that even the liberal mode doesn't really respect lexical scope
appeared in some other programming languages (see also T234690).
For instance:
(if true then (a := 1) else (a := 2) end); a
would be accepted by the liberal checker, even though under lexical scope,
`a` would be unbound. However, it is unlikely that lexical scope
will be suitable for the filter language, as most filters in
Wikimedia projects that have user-defined variable do violate lexical scope.
Bug: T260903
Bug: T238709
Bug: T237610
Bug: T234690
Bug: T231536
Change-Id: Ic6d030503e554933f8d220c6f87b680505918ae2
It is currently possible to save a filter with an invalid group, if you
manually change the form data. So prevent this by validating the group
before saving.
Change-Id: I03f80b8c6ab583a357273f7b2679a424ac784db7
Everyone can examine generated variables but not everyone
can test filters. Concerns Special:AbuseFilter/examine.
Change-Id: I9c205a0f1d9a7fdf15c4998d43983b9fa37f4694
This patch adds a transparent HTMLForm field that can be used to insert
the edit box inside an HTMLForm, and updates /test and /tools to use
that. The field class, together with the other editbox-related classes,
is now in a dedicated namespace. A future TODO is making it a real
HTMLForm field.
Also improve a bit the form in /test: add section labels and
avoid reusing the same label message used on Special:AbuseFilter.
Bug: T261584
Change-Id: Ib74bb5fdba4f8476169b754030fce6d4f72ce65a
- Clarify the label of the search form on Special:AbuseFilter
- Move introductory paragraphs to the very beginning of the page:
-- Before the profiling data on Special:AbuseFilter
-- Before the search form on Special:AbuseLog
- Make the search form on Special:AbuseFilter collapsible, and collapsed
by default
- Make a few buttons primary+progressive, specifically those that take
the user to a different page or act as submit-like buttons
Bug: T261584
Change-Id: I54517b01a9ea81d276283140e5cfafef575c3e2b
Use Echo for delivering the notification to the last
user who edited the filter.
Much boilerplate.
Change-Id: I7a46a03b4f15de20902ec70c62fb4fe750096842
Depends-On: If585b14a6dd6fb8c7d2c3bee1f20d9d08eaac706
This commit introduces some boilerplate for emitting warnings from the
AbuseFilter parser, and also code for showing these warnings in the ace
editor. Adding new warnings should be as simple as appending to
AbuseFilterParser::warnings (and adding the relevant i18n).
Bug: T264768
Bug: T269770
Change-Id: Ic11021b379f997a89f59c8c0572338d957e089a6
The main change is the addition of checkboxes to hide/show multiple
entries at the same time. Also, tweaked some i18n and made the process
return more useful success/error messages.
This patch introduces some technical debt, caused by SpecialAbuseLog and
AbuseLogPager being tightly coupled (which is a pre-existing problem,
but it got worse here).
Bug: T260904
Bug: T144096
Bug: T206945
Bug: T206938
Change-Id: I13f476d8126f81b0417e7509784c83d4f21cf348
Add a radio to select between "hide" and "show" instead of a single,
cryptic checkbox which doesn't really explain what it does.
Also wrap the list in a form which will later be used to mass-delete
entries.
Depends-On: I1bb45e47c3b42c01388b99778ce833e4e44419e1
Change-Id: Ie2d019fad5af7c626d722dc348f40eb0db21e527
