- Rename `$hidden` to `$privacyLevel` in Flags::__construct for
consistency with other places.
- Rename `shouldProtectFilter` and simplify its return value to always
be an array, since that's how it's currently used. Rename a variable
that is assigned the return value of this method.
- Add a missing message key to a list of dynamic message keys.
- Rename a property from 'hidden' to 'privacy' in FilterStoreTest for
consistency. Add a test for removing the protected flag.
- Update old comment referencing `filterHidden`; the method was removed
in I40b8c8452d9df.
- Use ISQLPlatform::bitAnd() instead of manual SQL in
AbuseFilterHistoryPager.
- Update mysterious reference to "formatRow" in SpecialAbuseLog.
- Update other references to the very same method in two other places,
this time credited as "SpecialAbuseLog".
- Add type hints to a few methods; this not only helps with type safety,
but it also allows PHPUnit to automatically use the proper type in
mocks.
Change-Id: Ib0167d993b761271c1e5311808435a616b6576fe
Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statement done manually
Change-Id: I48fcc02c61d423c9c5111ae545634fdc5c5cc710
The UI/UX for acknowledging a filter will be protected/is protected
could be clearer. The checkbox implemented currently doesn't make
it clear that the acknowledgement is mandatory and filters that are
already protected allow for the checkbox to be unchecked even though
that doesn't reflect that the filter cannot be unprotected.
- Update copy for the protected filter acknowledgement to make it clear
that it's a mandatory acknowledgement, not an optional one
- Update copy for the error that shows when a filter that should be
protected doesn't have the acknowledgement checked
- When a filter is already protected, disable the acknowledgement
checkbox to indicate this is not mutable
Bug: T364485
Change-Id: I667fcca4511dff1ac3ca69930c5b5e5eb5001787
- Add a basic checkbox on the filter edit page that must be checked if a
filter uses a protected variable to ensure that the user is aware that
their filter will also become protected
Bug: T364485
Change-Id: I7c7652f7d1a81223229b839ff7eee5da4af74c8a
Some exposed variables (eg. `user_ip`) used in filters are sensitive
and need to only be available to restricted groups of users.
Back-end changes:
- Add `AbuseFilterProtectedVariables` which defines what variables are
protected by the new right `abusefilter-access-protected-vars`
- Add the concept of a `protected` variable, the use of which will
denote the entire filter as protected via a flag on `af_hidden`
New UX features:
- Display changes to the protected status of filters on history and diff
pages
- Check for protected variables and the right to see them in filter
validation and don't allow a filter to be saved if it uses a variable
that the user doesn't have access to
- Check for the right to view protected variables before allowing access
and edits to existing filters that use them
Bug: T364465
Bug: T363906
Change-Id: I828bbb4015e87040f69a8e10c7888273c4f24dd3
The following sniffs are failing and were disabled:
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingDocumentationPublic
Change-Id: I6075c76d53a899aac56af027f9a956a6b9e6a667
This requires 1.42 for some new names
Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statements and changes to docs done manually
Change-Id: Ic1e2c9a0c891382744e4792bba1effece48e53f3
Almost all callers already provide an Authority in the form
of a User object, so mostly just need to change the typehints
Depends-On: I58661943c7e1acb6ff09798ee1a30be0fde3f459
Change-Id: I2ad86859c8194c14d7331f58db62b7cff4698085
ParserStatus is now more lightweight, and doesn't know about "result"
and "from cache". Instead, it has an isValid() method which is merely a
shorthand for checking whether getException() is null.
Introduce a child class, RuleCheckerStatus, which knows about result and
cache and can be (un)serialized.
This removes the ambiguity of the $result field, and helps the
transition to a new RuleChecker class.
Change-Id: I0dac7ab4febbfdabe72596631db630411d967ab5
The old parser now has the correct name "Evaluator", so the
ParserFactory name was outdated. Additionally, the plan is to create a
new RuleChecker class, acting as a facade for the different
parsing-related stages (lexer, parser, evaluator, etc.), which is what
most if not all callers should use. The RuleCheckerFactory still returns
a FilterEvaluator for now.
Also, "Parser" is a specific term defining *how* things happen
internally, whereas "RuleChecker" describes *what* callers should expect
from the new class.
Change-Id: I25b47a162d933c1e385175aae715ca38872b1442
Create a dedicated "Exception" sub-namespace and remove the "AFP"
prefix, a leftover from the pre-namespace era.
Change-Id: I7e5fded9316d8b7d1628bc1a6ba8b1879ac901e1
It is currently possible to save a filter with an invalid group, if you
manually change the form data. So prevent this by validating the group
before saving.
Change-Id: I03f80b8c6ab583a357273f7b2679a424ac784db7
This commit introduces some boilerplate for emitting warnings from the
AbuseFilter parser, and also code for showing these warnings in the ace
editor. Adding new warnings should be as simple as appending to
AbuseFilterParser::warnings (and adding the relevant i18n).
Bug: T264768
Bug: T269770
Change-Id: Ic11021b379f997a89f59c8c0572338d957e089a6
Just moving code around. Without a unit test because DI
coverage of change tags in core isn't available yet.
Change-Id: Iac861e1e24dae13581b8d9173357a1d6c94be88a
This moves a lot of things away from the AbuseFilter class. There's a
nasty static dependency on ChangeTags, but it's very limited anyway, and
it's going to be fixed once T245964 is resolved.
Change-Id: Ia7df4b4d3289c2722323f59ceecf3fdd38277785
