Why:
* When CheckUser asks the AbuseFilter extension for modifications
to rows inserted into the CheckUser tables, the AbuseFilter
extension attempts to get the Filter user via User::newSystemUser
* User::newSystemUser can deadlock if multiple requests to create
the system user are being made at once.
* The CheckUserHander does not need to create the abuse filter system
and instead only needs to know if a given $user is the equal to
the FilterUser.
* As such the FilterUser service needs to provide a way to check if
a given $user is equal without creating the FilterUser.
What:
* Add FilterUser::isUserSameAs which returns a boolean value
indicating whether the Abuse Filter system user is the equal
to a given UserIdentity in the same way that UserIdentity::equals
is implemented.
* Refactor ::getUser to get the username for the filter user in
a separate method, so that the ::isUserSameAs method can also
use this method. Name this new method ::getFilterUserName.
* Add a test for the FilterUser service to ensure consistent test
coverage
* Convert the @covers and @coversDefaultClass annotations to be
a @covers for the class. This is because PHPUnit recommends this in
https://docs.phpunit.de/en/9.6/annotations.html#appendixes-annotations-covers-tables-annotations
Bug: T356275
Bug: T346967
Change-Id: I8a101781bb47612deabb0f2a06a398ac13e860e6
This requires 1.42 for some new names
Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statements and changes to docs done manually
Change-Id: Ic1e2c9a0c891382744e4792bba1effece48e53f3
If the content language is English and the message is invalid as
a username, or the content language is not English and both the
content language version and the English version are invalid, the
user in FilterUser would not be created - now, avoid the onwiki
version of the English message in the fallback, so it could only
be invalid if the default in the i18n files was invalid.
Bug: T284364
Change-Id: I9e9f44b7663e810de70fb9ac7f6760f83dd4895b
Unfortunately, this isn't using DI completely, because of the
User::newSystemUser call. I'm not even sure if we really need to call it
or we can just stick to new UserIdentityValue, but leaving like this for
now.
Also, the types were weakened to UserIdentity, so the transition is
going to be easy anyway.
Change-Id: I08f8fae0fcc622ff0ac3f86771476d06d1c18549
